PMID-sentid	Pub_year	Sent_text		comp_official_name	comp_offsetprotein_name	organism	prot_offset
35591936-6	2022	Results: (1) The observation of the repair morphology of joint defect tissues showed that the repair effects of the Nar and ADM groups were better than that of the Mod group, and the repair effect of Nar/ADM group was the best (P < 0.05).	nar	200-203	ADM	Oryctolagus cuniculus	204-207	
35591936-7	2022	(2) Quantitative scoring of joint defect tissue showed that the Nar/ADM group had the best repair efficacy in the quantitative scores of the above two scales compared with the other groups (P < 0.05).	nar	64-67	ADM	Oryctolagus cuniculus	68-71	
35591936-8	2022	(3) Micro-CT scan showed that the ADM group had obvious repair of the defect structure, while the ADM/Nar group had blurred repair boundaries, and the layers of cartilage and subchondral bone were clear.	nar	102-105	ADM	Oryctolagus cuniculus	98-101	
35591936-9	2022	(4) Histological staining (H & E staining, Alcian blue stain, Safranin-O staining) showed that the ADM group had a better effect on the repair of joint structure at the joint defect, the Nar group had a better effect on the repair of cartilage quality at the joint defect, and the ADM/Nar group had satisfactory results in both of the above aspects.	nar	187-190	ADM	Oryctolagus cuniculus	281-284	
35591936-9	2022	(4) Histological staining (H & E staining, Alcian blue stain, Safranin-O staining) showed that the ADM group had a better effect on the repair of joint structure at the joint defect, the Nar group had a better effect on the repair of cartilage quality at the joint defect, and the ADM/Nar group had satisfactory results in both of the above aspects.	nar	285-288	ADM	Oryctolagus cuniculus	99-102