PMID-sentid	Pub_year	Sent_text		comp_official_name	comp_offsetprotein_name	organism	prot_offset
25873594-5	2015	We exemplify our approach by measuring the kinetics of cocaine, methylphenidate, and desipramine binding to SERT and DAT.	Desipramine	85-96	solute carrier family 6 member 3	Homo sapiens	117-120	
2529959-4	1989	Analyses of the differences between GMI and DMI indicated that rapid forgetting was more apparent for DAT than for HD patients in the early stages of these disorders.	Desipramine	44-47	solute carrier family 6 member 3	Homo sapiens	102-105	
25873594-6	2015	Our analysis revealed that the selectivity of methylphenidate and desipramine for DAT and SERT, respectively, can be accounted for by their rate of association and not by the residence time in their respective binding sites.	Desipramine	66-77	solute carrier family 6 member 3	Homo sapiens	82-85	
17690258-3	2007	We determined the crystal structure at 2.9 angstroms of the bacterial leucine transporter (LeuT), a homolog of SERT, NET, and DAT, in complex with leucine and the antidepressant desipramine.	Desipramine	178-189	solute carrier family 6 member 3	Homo sapiens	126-129	
17690258-7	2007	Mutagenesis experiments on human SERT and DAT indicate that both the desipramine-binding site and its inhibition mechanism are probably conserved in the human neurotransmitter transporters.	Desipramine	69-80	solute carrier family 6 member 3	Homo sapiens	42-45	
8848002-5	1995	In contrast, all chimeras containing dopamine transporter sequences from this region resemble the dopamine transporter, which demonstrates higher affinity for psychomotor stimulants compared with antidepressants (e.g., Ki = 391 +/- 39 nM cocaine compared with 9365 +/- 1260 nM desipramine).	Desipramine	277-288	solute carrier family 6 member 3	Homo sapiens	37-57	
8848002-5	1995	In contrast, all chimeras containing dopamine transporter sequences from this region resemble the dopamine transporter, which demonstrates higher affinity for psychomotor stimulants compared with antidepressants (e.g., Ki = 391 +/- 39 nM cocaine compared with 9365 +/- 1260 nM desipramine).	Desipramine	277-288	solute carrier family 6 member 3	Homo sapiens	98-118	
8848002-6	1995	A region including transmembrane domains 1-3 of the norepinephrine transporter also contributes to the interaction of desipramine and nisoxetine, whereas the analogous region of the dopamine transporter influences the affinity for piperazine derivatives (e.g., GBR12909 and LR1111) that are selective for the dopamine transporter.	Desipramine	118-129	solute carrier family 6 member 3	Homo sapiens	309-329