PMID-sentid	Pub_year	Sent_text		comp_official_name	comp_offsetprotein_name	organism	prot_offset
27355560-8	2016	Furthermore, there was a significant difference in CXCL16 between the MES-positive and MES-negative patients.	2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid	70-73	C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 16	Homo sapiens	51-57	
27355560-8	2016	Furthermore, there was a significant difference in CXCL16 between the MES-positive and MES-negative patients.	2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid	87-90	C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 16	Homo sapiens	51-57	
27355560-11	2016	Furthermore, if we used CXCL16 to distinguish the MES-positive and MES-negative patients, the AUC was 0.736; the cut-off value was 2.115ng/ml.	2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid	50-53	C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 16	Homo sapiens	24-30	
27355560-11	2016	Furthermore, if we used CXCL16 to distinguish the MES-positive and MES-negative patients, the AUC was 0.736; the cut-off value was 2.115ng/ml.	2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid	67-70	C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 16	Homo sapiens	24-30	
28975971-11	2017	The levels of serum CXCL16 in MES positive group were significantly higher than that in MES negative group; differences were statistically significant (p<0.05).	2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid	30-33	C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 16	Homo sapiens	20-26	
28975971-11	2017	The levels of serum CXCL16 in MES positive group were significantly higher than that in MES negative group; differences were statistically significant (p<0.05).	2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid	88-91	C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 16	Homo sapiens	20-26	
27355560-4	2016	Thus, we explored whether CXCL16 correlates to MES.	2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid	47-50	C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 16	Homo sapiens	26-32