PMID-sentid	Pub_year	Sent_text		comp_official_name	comp_offsetprotein_name	organism	prot_offset
31222631-7	2020	RESULTS: After covarying for age, gender, body mass index, chronic pain status, salivary flow rate, and NA, higher PA was associated with lower salivary CRP (beta = - 0.02, 95% CI (- 0.03, - 0.00) sr2 = .06, p = .01) but not IL-6; removing NA from this model did not change results.	Protactinium	115-117	C-reactive protein	Homo sapiens	153-156	
9532638-8	1997	Plasma levels of C-reactive protein are all within normal limits, which may suggest that PA activity is restricted to a local inflammatory reaction in the airway mucosa.	Protactinium	89-91	C-reactive protein	Homo sapiens	17-35	
31222631-10	2020	CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that higher PA may be associated with lower salivary CRP in young adults, even after accounting for NA and demographic characteristics.	Protactinium	42-44	C-reactive protein	Homo sapiens	83-86	
24665572-5	2014	RESULTS: In the group of full-term neonates with PA significantly higher levels of cardiac tropon-inI (p = 0.000), CK-MB fraction (p = 0.000), brain natriuretic peptide (p = 0.003) and C-reactive protein (p = 0.017) were found, compared to the group of healthy full-term newborns.	Protactinium	49-51	C-reactive protein	Homo sapiens	185-203	
30217538-2	2018	We examined how different indicators of NA and PA predicted concentrations of C-reactive protein (CRP) and seven peripheral inflammatory cytokines (IL-1beta, IL-6, TNF-alpha, IL-8, IL-4, IL-10, and IFN-gamma) that were examined in the form of an inflammatory composite.	Protactinium	47-49	C-reactive protein	Homo sapiens	78-96	
30217538-2	2018	We examined how different indicators of NA and PA predicted concentrations of C-reactive protein (CRP) and seven peripheral inflammatory cytokines (IL-1beta, IL-6, TNF-alpha, IL-8, IL-4, IL-10, and IFN-gamma) that were examined in the form of an inflammatory composite.	Protactinium	47-49	C-reactive protein	Homo sapiens	98-101	
27444965-2	2017	We hypothesized that greater PA would buffer against the influence of perceived psychological stress (PPS) on systemic inflammation, operationalized as C-reactive protein (CRP, mg/L).	Protactinium	29-31	C-reactive protein	Homo sapiens	152-170	
27444965-2	2017	We hypothesized that greater PA would buffer against the influence of perceived psychological stress (PPS) on systemic inflammation, operationalized as C-reactive protein (CRP, mg/L).	Protactinium	29-31	C-reactive protein	Homo sapiens	172-175	
27444965-3	2017	Specifically, we predicted that PA would moderate the relationship between PPS and CRP.	Protactinium	32-34	C-reactive protein	Homo sapiens	83-86	
27444965-6	2017	Using a moderated hierarchical regression analysis, PPS and PA significantly interacted to predict levels of CRP (p<0.05).	Protactinium	60-62	C-reactive protein	Homo sapiens	109-112	
27444965-7	2017	Examination of the simple slopes revealed a disordinal interaction between PPS and PA, such that higher PA was protective against elevated CRP levels, but only when individuals also reported greater levels of PPS.	Protactinium	83-85	C-reactive protein	Homo sapiens	139-142	
27444965-7	2017	Examination of the simple slopes revealed a disordinal interaction between PPS and PA, such that higher PA was protective against elevated CRP levels, but only when individuals also reported greater levels of PPS.	Protactinium	104-106	C-reactive protein	Homo sapiens	139-142	
27444965-9	2017	Findings also provide caution of future assumptions that relationships among PA, PPS, and physical health markers, such as CRP, are always positive (e.g., PA) or negative (e.g., PPS) in nature.	Protactinium	77-79	C-reactive protein	Homo sapiens	123-126	
25918522-7	2015	The CRP level in PA group was significantly higher than that in non-PA.	Protactinium	17-19	C-reactive protein	Homo sapiens	4-7	
25918522-7	2015	The CRP level in PA group was significantly higher than that in non-PA.	Protactinium	68-70	C-reactive protein	Homo sapiens	4-7	
22528165-12	2012	The mean (standard deviation) changes in CRP levels from baseline at 48 hr in Groups AA, PA, and PP were 141.0 (72.4), 153.5 (42.2), and 111.2 (84.6), respectively.	Protactinium	89-91	C-reactive protein	Homo sapiens	41-44	
23827295-9	2013	CRP also showed the highest sensitivity (100%) and negative predictive value (100%) for PA.	Protactinium	88-90	C-reactive protein	Homo sapiens	0-3	
23827295-12	2013	CONCLUSIONS: CRP provides the highest diagnostic accuracy for PA.	Protactinium	62-64	C-reactive protein	Homo sapiens	13-16	
22777489-6	2013	RESULTS: Comparing the PA and N-PA group, the first presented lower: total body mass (-13%), body mass index (-16%), fat mass (kg -39%, FM% -30%), CRP (-23%), serum insulin (-61%), homeostasis model assessment (HOMA, -35%) and serum leptin (-62%; P<0.05).	Protactinium	23-25	C-reactive protein	Homo sapiens	147-150	
18664531-12	2008	The PA group had significantly lower serum CRP than the PI group.	Protactinium	4-6	C-reactive protein	Homo sapiens	43-46	
18991814-8	2008	CONCLUSION: HMG-CoA-reductase inhibitor atorvastatin more effectively lowers concentration of CRP in blood plasma of patients with PA than with IHD what possibly is explained by higher initial level of this marker of inflammatory processes.	Protactinium	131-133	C-reactive protein	Homo sapiens	94-97