PMID-sentid	Pub_year	Sent_text		comp_official_name	comp_offsetprotein_name	organism	prot_offset
30307055-6	2019	PAs located in the submandibular gland demonstrated CTNNB1-PLAG1 fusion at a significantly higher rate than other fusions (P = 0.0109).	Protactinium	0-3	PLAG1 zinc finger	Homo sapiens	59-64	
27473265-7	2016	Thirty-seven PAs (92.5%), 15 residual PAs (71%), and 14 CXPAs (35%) were positive for PLAG1.	Protactinium	13-16	PLAG1 zinc finger	Homo sapiens	86-91	
27463119-4	2016	PLAG1 IHC expression has been reported to be positive in most PAs.	Protactinium	62-65	PLAG1 zinc finger	Homo sapiens	0-5	
27463119-12	2016	Hence, PLAG1 is a modest marker for PAs in FNAs.	Protactinium	36-39	PLAG1 zinc finger	Homo sapiens	7-12	
25439740-7	2015	PLAG1 or HMGA2 rearrangements were identified in 6 (67%) of 9 hypocellular myxoid PAs and in 2 (29%) of 7 cellular PAs.	Protactinium	82-85	PLAG1 zinc finger	Homo sapiens	0-5	
25439740-11	2015	Interestingly, rearrangements of PLAG1/HMGA2 were identified in most hypocellular PAs but only in a small subset of cellular PAs.	Protactinium	82-85	PLAG1 zinc finger	Homo sapiens	33-38	
24468654-13	2014	Immunohistochemical analysis revealed frequent overexpression of the translocation target gene PLAG1 in PAs and in 1 Ca-ex-PA.	Protactinium	104-107	PLAG1 zinc finger	Homo sapiens	95-100	
26882287-10	2016	CONCLUSIONS: An immunohistochemical panel of MYB, KIT, PLAG1, and HMGA2 on fine-needle aspiration cell blocks is useful in distinguishing ACCs and PAs from each other and other salivary gland neoplasms.	Protactinium	147-150	PLAG1 zinc finger	Homo sapiens	55-60