PMID-sentid Pub_year Sent_text comp_official_name comp_offsetprotein_name organism prot_offset 5049806-1 1972 DURING MYELOGRAPHY WE OBSERVED THE CONTRAST MATERIAL IN THE SPINAL SUBARACHNOID SPACE WHILE WE CHANGED: (1) the intracranial blood volume by CO(2) inhalation, hyperventilation, and jugular vein compression; (2) the intra-abdominal and intrathoracic pressure by forced expiration with glottis closed; and (3) the CSF volume by withdrawals and reinjections of fluid. co(2) 141-146 colony stimulating factor 2 Homo sapiens 312-315 23205912-1 2012 In the presence of 1.1 equiv of PhMe(2)Si-Bpin, 5 equiv of CsF, and 20 mol % of TsOH H(2)O, precursors of N-Boc-imines can be converted into the corresponding alpha-aryl or alpha-alkenyl glycine derivatives under gaseous CO(2) in moderate-to-high yields with a single operation. co(2) 221-226 colony stimulating factor 2 Homo sapiens 59-62 21695026-3 2011 The analysis shows how use of these principles leads to quite different conclusions than those of most previous such economic analyses, as follows: The economic benefits of reducing CO(2) emissions may be about two orders of magnitude less than those estimated by most economists because the climate sensitivity factor (CSF) is much lower than assumed by the United Nations because feedback is negative rather than positive and the effects of CO(2) emissions reductions on atmospheric CO(2) appear to be short rather than long lasting. co(2) 182-187 colony stimulating factor 2 Homo sapiens 292-318 21695026-3 2011 The analysis shows how use of these principles leads to quite different conclusions than those of most previous such economic analyses, as follows: The economic benefits of reducing CO(2) emissions may be about two orders of magnitude less than those estimated by most economists because the climate sensitivity factor (CSF) is much lower than assumed by the United Nations because feedback is negative rather than positive and the effects of CO(2) emissions reductions on atmospheric CO(2) appear to be short rather than long lasting. co(2) 182-187 colony stimulating factor 2 Homo sapiens 320-323 21695026-3 2011 The analysis shows how use of these principles leads to quite different conclusions than those of most previous such economic analyses, as follows: The economic benefits of reducing CO(2) emissions may be about two orders of magnitude less than those estimated by most economists because the climate sensitivity factor (CSF) is much lower than assumed by the United Nations because feedback is negative rather than positive and the effects of CO(2) emissions reductions on atmospheric CO(2) appear to be short rather than long lasting. co(2) 443-448 colony stimulating factor 2 Homo sapiens 292-318 21695026-3 2011 The analysis shows how use of these principles leads to quite different conclusions than those of most previous such economic analyses, as follows: The economic benefits of reducing CO(2) emissions may be about two orders of magnitude less than those estimated by most economists because the climate sensitivity factor (CSF) is much lower than assumed by the United Nations because feedback is negative rather than positive and the effects of CO(2) emissions reductions on atmospheric CO(2) appear to be short rather than long lasting. co(2) 443-448 colony stimulating factor 2 Homo sapiens 320-323 21695026-3 2011 The analysis shows how use of these principles leads to quite different conclusions than those of most previous such economic analyses, as follows: The economic benefits of reducing CO(2) emissions may be about two orders of magnitude less than those estimated by most economists because the climate sensitivity factor (CSF) is much lower than assumed by the United Nations because feedback is negative rather than positive and the effects of CO(2) emissions reductions on atmospheric CO(2) appear to be short rather than long lasting. co(2) 443-448 colony stimulating factor 2 Homo sapiens 292-318 21695026-3 2011 The analysis shows how use of these principles leads to quite different conclusions than those of most previous such economic analyses, as follows: The economic benefits of reducing CO(2) emissions may be about two orders of magnitude less than those estimated by most economists because the climate sensitivity factor (CSF) is much lower than assumed by the United Nations because feedback is negative rather than positive and the effects of CO(2) emissions reductions on atmospheric CO(2) appear to be short rather than long lasting. co(2) 443-448 colony stimulating factor 2 Homo sapiens 320-323