PMID-sentid	Pub_year	Sent_text		comp_official_name	comp_offsetprotein_name	organism	prot_offset
5049806-1	1972	DURING MYELOGRAPHY WE OBSERVED THE CONTRAST MATERIAL IN THE SPINAL SUBARACHNOID SPACE WHILE WE CHANGED: (1) the intracranial blood volume by CO(2) inhalation, hyperventilation, and jugular vein compression; (2) the intra-abdominal and intrathoracic pressure by forced expiration with glottis closed; and (3) the CSF volume by withdrawals and reinjections of fluid.	co(2)	141-146	colony stimulating factor 2	Homo sapiens	312-315	
23205912-1	2012	In the presence of 1.1 equiv of PhMe(2)Si-Bpin, 5 equiv of CsF, and 20 mol % of TsOH H(2)O, precursors of N-Boc-imines can be converted into the corresponding alpha-aryl or alpha-alkenyl glycine derivatives under gaseous CO(2) in moderate-to-high yields with a single operation.	co(2)	221-226	colony stimulating factor 2	Homo sapiens	59-62	
21695026-3	2011	The analysis shows how use of these principles leads to quite different conclusions than those of most previous such economic analyses, as follows: The economic benefits of reducing CO(2) emissions may be about two orders of magnitude less than those estimated by most economists because the climate sensitivity factor (CSF) is much lower than assumed by the United Nations because feedback is negative rather than positive and the effects of CO(2) emissions reductions on atmospheric CO(2) appear to be short rather than long lasting.	co(2)	182-187	colony stimulating factor 2	Homo sapiens	292-318	
21695026-3	2011	The analysis shows how use of these principles leads to quite different conclusions than those of most previous such economic analyses, as follows: The economic benefits of reducing CO(2) emissions may be about two orders of magnitude less than those estimated by most economists because the climate sensitivity factor (CSF) is much lower than assumed by the United Nations because feedback is negative rather than positive and the effects of CO(2) emissions reductions on atmospheric CO(2) appear to be short rather than long lasting.	co(2)	182-187	colony stimulating factor 2	Homo sapiens	320-323	
21695026-3	2011	The analysis shows how use of these principles leads to quite different conclusions than those of most previous such economic analyses, as follows: The economic benefits of reducing CO(2) emissions may be about two orders of magnitude less than those estimated by most economists because the climate sensitivity factor (CSF) is much lower than assumed by the United Nations because feedback is negative rather than positive and the effects of CO(2) emissions reductions on atmospheric CO(2) appear to be short rather than long lasting.	co(2)	443-448	colony stimulating factor 2	Homo sapiens	292-318	
21695026-3	2011	The analysis shows how use of these principles leads to quite different conclusions than those of most previous such economic analyses, as follows: The economic benefits of reducing CO(2) emissions may be about two orders of magnitude less than those estimated by most economists because the climate sensitivity factor (CSF) is much lower than assumed by the United Nations because feedback is negative rather than positive and the effects of CO(2) emissions reductions on atmospheric CO(2) appear to be short rather than long lasting.	co(2)	443-448	colony stimulating factor 2	Homo sapiens	320-323	
21695026-3	2011	The analysis shows how use of these principles leads to quite different conclusions than those of most previous such economic analyses, as follows: The economic benefits of reducing CO(2) emissions may be about two orders of magnitude less than those estimated by most economists because the climate sensitivity factor (CSF) is much lower than assumed by the United Nations because feedback is negative rather than positive and the effects of CO(2) emissions reductions on atmospheric CO(2) appear to be short rather than long lasting.	co(2)	443-448	colony stimulating factor 2	Homo sapiens	292-318	
21695026-3	2011	The analysis shows how use of these principles leads to quite different conclusions than those of most previous such economic analyses, as follows: The economic benefits of reducing CO(2) emissions may be about two orders of magnitude less than those estimated by most economists because the climate sensitivity factor (CSF) is much lower than assumed by the United Nations because feedback is negative rather than positive and the effects of CO(2) emissions reductions on atmospheric CO(2) appear to be short rather than long lasting.	co(2)	443-448	colony stimulating factor 2	Homo sapiens	320-323